Content Sharing in Regards to DM Assignment

Comments

5 comments

  • Avatar
    Henry L Neufeld

    The DM should create a campaign on his own account, that is free, and anyone in the campaign may share content, including homebrew items et al.

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Mark McCollum

    Yes, once content sharing is turned on, anything anybody has purchased is shared, regardless of who is DM.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Christopher Stark

    Yes Henry, but if the DM has no sub, then they are limited on the items/characters/etc. they can create and I'd prefer if the players didnt have to create the homebrew items, as that should be done by the dm and kept secret from the party, until the time comes to add it to that players inventory.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Henry L Neufeld

    True, Christopher...I don’t see a way around it that would benefit the company, and not be in violation of licensing agreements with WotC. They already seem pretty liberal with their sharing policies. The DM may have to buy a script and offline some characters, if they don’t wish to purchase the digital content, and keep it secret.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Vmthomas72

    Yep, what they said. That stuff first, but while you're at it...

    It would also be quite useful to have the option for multiple individuals to be assigned as DM to a campaign. For example, a hypothetical campaign includes 7 individuals--2 individuals assigned the role of 'DM,' and 5 individuals assigned the role of 'player.' I do envision this as something where the role assigned to each person in the campaign would be exclusive of other roles so that an individual could not be assigned as a 'player' and as a 'DM' for the same campaign.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.